This morning I received a most distressing
letter which threw all my plans for the day into disarray! A shower of
uncircumcised usurers represented by Belgard Solicitors sent me the following communique.
“Date: 6th November
2015
Our Ref: OS/5200116
Your Reference:
Our Client: ACC Loan
Management Limited
Account Name: P J
WALSH
Account No:
T768570
Amount Outstanding: €362,771.56
Dear
Sir,
We
act on behalf of the above named Client.
Our Client’s records indicate that you are
presently indebted to them for the amount specified above, full particulars of
which have been provided to you, but you have failed, refused and/or neglected
to discharge.
Take notice that we hereby demand payment of the
above amount within seven days from
the date of this letter. In the event of your failure to discharge the debt to
our office within seven days we have received our Client’s peremptory
instructions to issue legal proceedings against you. In the event of
proceedings being issued we shall seek recovery of the full amount due together
with any legal costs incurred. In the event of your continued default
thereafter, our instructions are to proceed to judgement and to enforce the
said judgement by all available means.
You can contact The Money Advice and Budgeting
Service (MABS) if you have difficulty in making payment. MABS is a national,
free, confidential and independent service for people unable to discharge their
debts. They should be able to give you advice and may be able to contact us to
try come to an arrangement that is satisfactory to everyone’s point of view.
We
look forward to hearing from you within the seven day period.
The
letter was signed by no individual and merely concluded;
Yours
faithfully,
Belgard Solicitors
Belgard
Solicitors,
(Note
the letter finished with a comma; could that be symbolic?)
Now I ask you? Is that not some load of
horseshit for breakfast? Who are these people who can cause a deity-fearing,
law-abiding citizen with this type of threat before “The early-rising sun has
not attained his noon”? Always liked Robert Herrick! At any rate I was tempted
to rush out and break my vow of November abstinence at the head of it all. But
no; on mature reflection and recollection I decided to take the advice of the
anonymous one and contact this MABS outfit. I had occasion to deal with this agency
before and had benefited from the expert, understanding and problem-solving
expertise of a lady called Marie Shields who should be the Minister for Finance
instead of the gobshite Noonan who deals in figures but not people.
I rang the MABS office in Athlone to make an
appointment with the afore-mentioned Ms Shields. Fortune favours the brave! By
the most fortuitous of circumstances Ms Shields could see me on the morrow
because of a minute old cancellation by another distressed party.
On my previous sojourns with this agency I found
it necessary to do a detailed account of my income and expenditure to determine
what leeway the leeches might have for further blood-sucking. I settled into
the task and gradually discovered that I am not a model of fiscal prudence. Bit
like this Government, and the last ten, except for the simple expedient that
the Dept. of Money uses you me and everybody else as guarantors. I don’t have
this latitude, unfortunately. However, this exercise was most beneficial and
gave me a blow-by-blow account of how to ‘blow’ your meagre income. I
considered all of these matters and one unspoken element impacted on me very
forcibly.
The legal tender vampires had to know how you
spent your meagre income but there was no mention of how you didn’t get rid of
those euros and cents that you didn’t possess! Time to do another ready
reckoning. To me the items in terms of human comfort and cossetting had a
significant bearing on all of these matters yet were never deemed to be a
factor. Time to set the record straight!
I went through my accounts without feeling the
necessity of recruiting any expertise and jotted down all my transactions in
the columns under ‘income’ and ‘expenditure’. All of this has to be accurate,
representative of actual fiscal transactions and capable of being subjected to
the most forensic financial scrutiny. I spent hours at this depressing task and
eventually had all the salient information on paper. You can’t imagine my
horror when the bottom line balance established beyond all reasonable doubt
that my mandatory expenditure exceeded my income by no less than €60 per month.
The shame of it. Living beyond my reckonable means! All of this and the
deprivation suffered because of what I forego of life’s little luxuries.
Among the items I can no
longer afford.
üOfferings; donations,
contributions to charity, or any other philanthropic gestures.
ü
Newspapers; I used to read one
daily, one provincial and two Sunday newspapers. (Cost today €20.00)
ü
Holidays however modest.
ü
Luxuries of any kind.
ü
Presents for self, friends or
family or any reason. (e.g.) Birthdays, Anniversaries, Christmas or any other
occasion.
ü
Attendance at any social
events
incurring a cost, including parties, weddings, christenings or other occasions.
ü
New clothes. I recently attended a
funeral wearing a suit made by a company which has ceased production for over
twenty years.
ü
Alcohol: I used to enjoy a
social drink.
ü
Cigarettes; not an option anymore.
ü
Change of car; forget it. Present car
is the last I will ever drive and is ten years old and may be worth €2k.
ü
Books. My only real passion. I
now borrow from the ‘free’ library.
ü
Travel, even within the
country. I have family members in Great Britain and the United States but will
be unlikely to see them in their own countries. I look forward to the ‘free
travel’ when and if I soon come of age.
ü
Housing of my choice. Since
1971 I have always lived in my own house and I now live in a Local Authority
house which was picked for me and consider myself lucky to have any kind of
home.
ü
A headstone or grave. Dying is
expensive and I have decreed in my will, which was free, that I am to be
cremated thereby eliminating the costs associated with a traditional funeral.
ü
Legal fees. I recently brought a
legitimate grievance to a firm of solicitors who confirmed that I had a
perfectly reasonable case which needed no proving but could not be taken on a
pro-bono basis therefore I was excluded from the justice system.(I subsequently
applied and qualified for Legal Aid, which Board would not take my case
anyway).
ü
Cover Charge Events including theatre,
cinema, concerts, going to the circus and Mass.
No comments:
Post a Comment