Having in yesterday’s entry considered the
lunatic behaviour of the disappointed aspirants to the nomination as candidate
for the Fianna Fáil Party in the upcoming general election I try to understand
what prompts these people. Most folk who use logic as their yardstick would
have you believe that a life in politics is no life at all. Family
considerations go out the window as does a social life. For every one
constituent you satisfy there are another ten who are disappointed. When you go
to the doors of the common people you can expect the general salutation,
regardless of which party you purport to represent,
“A plague on both your houses”.
So why do these people hunger for a life in an
occupation that is despised, derided and universally mistrusted? It must be
greed; greed for power! And is greed not defined as one of the Seven Deadly
Sins? Let us consider if this human trait is really a sin or just normal
behaviour. The word to describe ‘greed’ when I was interested in such matters
was ‘covetousness’. This word featured prominently in the ‘Ten Commandments’.
Covetousness is
defined as a;
“Feeling
of grudging admiration and desire to have something that is possessed by
another”.
On the other hand ‘greed’ is defined as;
“Excessive consumption of or desire for food, gluttony, excessive
desire, as for wealth or power”.
How do we fare when
we compare the two definitions?
While it could be construed that ‘covetousness’
and ‘greed’ are essentially the same there would appear to be some subtle
differences. While greed is manifest as senseless, immediate and uncontrolled
its brother covetousness would appear to be more rational, calculating and
desirous of a more long term ambition. The ninth and tenth Commandments decree
that thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s goods or wife and yet to aspire to
and indeed achieve these dubious ends is often regarded as success in human
terms. Yet there is a certain premeditated cunning inherent in these
objectives. Does this render covetousness sinful? As they say in “who wants to
be a millionaire”, ask the audience!
In the case of the Prodigal the ongoing
demonstration of greed worldwide is a curse and one of the most destructive
forces on the planet. ‘Much wants more’ is a very old saying and still rings
true. People globally believe that the accumulation and display of material
wealth somehow gives them an advantage over those who have less and therefore
become inferior or subservient. It says in the bible or somewhere that
“what does it benefit a man to gain the
whole world and lose his immortal soul”?
This statement presupposes the existence of an
entity called the soul and gives the soul an enormous value that in terms of
real significance outweighs every other entity of calculable consequence. The
essential question is; does greed as we understand it cause damage and distress
to ordinary mortals and can it therefore be rightly defined as a deadly sin?
The answer is yes.
When our other friends in the animal world get
enough for sustenance they don’t hanker after an excess of what might be
available. To desire and aspire to gain what is totally superfluous to one’s
requirements is damaging to the aspirant and the rest of society. If the bounty
of this world is distributed unevenly because of man’s greed then his fellow
man is inevitably the victim. If the excess of one leads to the shortage of
another then greed becomes the real pariah in society.
The so-called developed nations of the world
have a suicide rate that is ten times greater that the ‘third world’. How can
we justify or explain this phenomenon? The explanation to the Prodigal is
simple. It is my absolute belief that the vast majority of unhappiness in this
world is caused by extravagant and unattainable expectations. In our affluent
society we believe that we are ‘entitled’ to realize wealth and human comforts
which we have never achieved for ourselves as individuals but feel totally entitled
to inherit. When the situation comes to pass where these self-assumed
privileges do not materialise then we feel cheated. Insufficiency in those
advantages, leading to self-doubt and the deeming of ourselves to be somehow
denied of what is rightfully ours, often causes relegation into frustration and
despair wherein the outlet of suicide becomes a real alternative. In the
so-called third world such expectations do not exist.
It must be construed therefore that if the only
expectation a man has is to get enough food to keep him alive for this day then
the level of disappointment is greatly diminished. My old pal Mahatma Gandhi decreed
that;
“Earth provides enough to satisfy
every man’s need but not every man’s greed.”
I think that the father of
India had it right.
The Prodigal is convinced that perceived greed
leads to perceived inequality which in turn leads to dissent and social
upheaval. The haves look down on the have-nots and the perception of the
powerful depriving the less well-off has led to every revolution in history.
The legacy of subjugation of our own nation should be sufficient to demonstrate
how the greed of our nearest neighbour has caused a millennium of resentment
and an eternal desire to realize the realignment of what is no longer possible.
In truth, it must be conceded that greed is without doubt not alone a deadly
sin but must be recorded as the deadliest of the “Seven Deadly Sins”.
If this state is the bedrock of political
activity, to hell with them all!
No comments:
Post a Comment